Big City Capabilities.
Small Town Values.
Starr Austen & Miller is a unique team of experienced attorneys serving a wide range of clients, from family cases to civil litigation and personal injury. Regardless of legal concern, our clients can bring ALL legal needs to us to find the best solutions.
A Deep Team of Experts Handling Toughest Cases
With 100+ years of experience, we tackle complex cases, from personal injury to fraud and criminal law. Our big-city expertise and in-house research ensure a thorough, strategic approach.
Small-Town Costs With the Advantage of Big-City Talent
Based in Logansport, we offer top-tier legal representation at rates up to 25% lower than big-city firms—helping clients save without compromising on quality or expertise.
Building Meaningful Client Relationships That Last
More than just litigators, we prioritize communication, shared insights, and ongoing support—ensuring our clients are always informed, protected, and prepared for what’s ahead.
Advocates on Both Sides of the Courtroom
Whether representing plaintiffs seeking justice or defending clients against claims, we bring strategic expertise to every case. Our balanced approach ensures fairness, thoughtful advocacy, and a deep understanding of both sides of the legal process.
Committed to Your Case with No Upfront Fees
Justice shouldn’t come with a financial burden. That’s why, in most cases, we work on a contingency basis—meaning you don’t pay attorney fees unless we win your case. Your success is our priority, and we’re committed to earning our fee by delivering results.
When You Need Solutions,
We Are Here to Help
Our Latest New
Jury Awards $15 Million in Punitive Damages Against MetLife for Ponzi Scheme Involvement
Last year MetLife and one of its subsidiaries were assessed $15 million in punitive damages by a jury for its failure to discover one of its agents was selling unregistered securities along with life insurance policies. The unregistered securities were actually promissory notes which were allegedly invested in a $200 million Ponzi scheme. The plaintiff, Christine Ramirez, claimed that MetLife’s subsidiary New England Life Insurance Company had an agent who was selling her these unregistered securities at the same time he was selling her life insurance.
What is the “Fraud-on-the-Market” Doctrine of Securities Fraud?
In the United States Supreme Court case of Basic, Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), the Court ruled that in certain circumstances a securities class action would be appropriate notwithstanding what otherwise would be individualized issues of reliance. Basic...
SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations Identifies Frequent Advisor and Brokerage Firm Shortcomings
Starr Austen & Miller has represented over a thousand victims of either investment advisor negligence or stockbroker fraud. In almost every case the guilty advisor or broker failed to comply with his firm’s own compliance manual. Typically, such conduct has been...